Standardized tests can be powerful tools, but their effectiveness really depends on how and why they are used. They are at their best when the assessment goals are clearly defined and the test items are designed to measure meaningful learning—especially when they include higher‑order thinking skills, not just recall. In these cases, standardized tests can provide reliable data, show patterns across learners, and help teachers evaluate whether learning objectives have been achieved.

However, standardized tests are at their worst when they rely on only one type of question or measure a very narrow skill set. When every item looks the same, the test fails to capture the full range of student understanding. They also become less effective when used as the sole basis for judging student ability, teacher performance, or school quality. Over‑reliance on standardized tests can lead to teaching to the test, stress for learners, and a limited view of what students can actually do.

In short, standardized tests can support learning when used thoughtfully and alongside other forms of assessment—but they become problematic when they oversimplify complex skills or dominate the entire evaluation process.

• John Opre

Yes, I agree with you. Indeed, if the assessment is planned well then standardize test supports learning.

• May Reah Baylon