An example of an educational evaluation can be found in the assessment of school-based reading intervention programs. These evaluations often use a mixed-methods approach, combining standardized reading tests with classroom observations and teacher interviews. The strengths of this evaluation model lie in its comprehensiveness: quantitative measures provide evidence of student progress, while qualitative insights capture teacher perspectives and contextual factors that shape outcomes (Fitzpatrick, Sanders, & Worthen, 2011).

However, weaknesses include the potential for over-reliance on test scores, which may not fully reflect improvements in reading engagement or critical thinking. Furthermore, such evaluations can be resource-intensive, requiring significant time and training for effective implementation.

Overall, this type of educational evaluation helps identify both the measurable academic gains and the less tangible elements of student learning, leading to more informed decisions about program continuation or improvement.

Reference
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.