e-Learning Ecologies MOOC’s Updates
Blended Learning Increases Student Engagement
According to Marzano (2004), the pedagogical approach of blended learning increases student engagement and achievement. Moreover, blended learning gives students the ability to take responsibility for and ownership of their learning. Student learning and engagement increase when students are dynamically involved in their learning and when learning materials are challenging and interesting (Dewey, 1938; Dror, 2010; Newmann, 1996; Vygotsky, 1978). Blended learning leads to better understanding and comprehension, supports individualized learning, and increases student success (Akgunduz & Akinoglu, 2017, as cited in Estill, 2019).
A study conducted by Dahlstrom et al. (2015), discovered that students had a positive outlook regarding technology and preferred blended learning classroom experiences. Likewise, Wang et al. (2015) reported students’ positive responses to blended learning were due to an increase in accountability, metacognitive ability, empowerment, and engagement. Students also enjoyed the flexibility of time for completing activities and the personal attention they received from teachers during tutorials or small group rotations (Alijani et al., 2014, as cited in Estill, 2019). Watch the video to see how students thrive in a self-paced blended learning model:
A survey conducted by Wengreen et al. (2015, as cited in Estill, 2019) found that 80% of students recommended that courses be taught in a blended format. Data from the survey showed students who were enrolled in blended courses earned higher grades and reported higher levels of satisfaction when compared to those students exclusively taking on-campus or strictly online courses. Likewise, results from a study conducted by Estill (2019) reported positive teacher perceptions of blended learning using an LMS including "increased student engagement, higher rates of assignment completion, and less destructive student behaviors" (p. 181). Given the current state of distance learning at all levels of education, it is important for teachers to remember that blended learning includes human interaction. Therefore, educators should consistently create activities that encourage peer collaboration in online learning.
References
Akgündüz, D., & Akınoğlu, O. (2017). The impact of blended learning and social media- supported learning on the academic success and motivation of the students in science education. Egitim Ve Bilim, 42(191). Retrieved from https://seu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.seu.idm.oclc.org/docview/1940828185?accountid=43912
Alijani, G. S., Kwun, O., & Yu, Y. (2014). Effectiveness of blended learning in KIPP New Orleans schools. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(2), 125-141. Retrieved from https://seu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest- com.seu.idm.oclc.org/docview/1645850304?accountid=43912
Dahlstrom, E. D., Brooks, C. B., Grajek, S., & Reeves, J. (2015). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. (Research Report) Retrieved from Educause Center for Analysis and Research website: https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/8/~/media/24ddc1aa35a5490389baf28b6ddb3693.ashx
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.
Estill, L. (2019). Teachers' perceptions of leadership support for the implementation of learning management systems in urban middle schools. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest.
Dror, I. (2010). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Inside Learning Technologies and Skills, 79-84. Retrieved from http://www.cedma-europe.org
Newmann, F. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380-393. Retrieved from https://seu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search- proquest-com.seu.idm.oclc.org/docview/1683511641?accountid=43912
Wengreen, H. J., Dimmick, M., & Israelsen, M. (2015). Evaluation of a blended design in a large general education nutrition course. NACTA Journal, 59(1), 70-74. Retrieved from https://seu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest- com.seu.idm.oclc.org/docview/1660305021?accountid=43912
Blended learning a consideration some institutions are adopting as they plan to go completely online
Blended learning as a learning delivery modality rests on an efficient and effective design of instruction that uses a combination of instructional techniques (using technology, face-to-face, using radio or television, printed learning packages or self-learning kits) to reach all students. Since one of its aims is inclusivity that is to involve all students - no one is to be left behind- all learners get engaged with the lesson. Their increased motivation, sense of accountability for their own success, empowerment, cooperation, and meta-cognitive ability propel them to become successful.