(E)-portfolios, to my understanding, are currently widely used for art-based subjects. However, it would be extremely meaningful to see them being used in Science. I am a science teacher and that I why my comment revolves around this subject. (E)-portfolios allow for wholesome learning and feedback without being hung on tests where the output is ‘just’ absorbed knowledge.

Firstly, A lot of platforms like google sites, wordpress, blogger etc allow for storage of information that could be used as evidence of growth and step-wise active knowledge creation. Starting from scratch for a long term project and documenting important steps creates a tangible timeline for the learner and the guide.

Secondly, the platforms can be used in pairs or groups and learning can be increased by social interactions. For, example, the ‘published’ first step to a final product is documented and allowed for peer review. This can be in the form of a comment or chat. This could provide the portfolio owner multiple perspectives and allow for improvements. Approaches can be limited to the environment but with wider feedback the portfolio owner has advantages.

Lastly, physical portfolios can be used instead of digital ones for adapting to circumstances and learning needs. By this we are not limited by technology or electricity that powers technology. Learners can visualise their thought process and can improve in real-time.