I. Introduction

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a blended learning program implemented in a high school setting, focusing on student engagement, academic performance, and overall satisfaction.

II. Program Description

Background: The blended learning program combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online learning components.
Target Population: 200 high school students across various subjects.
Duration: One academic year.

III. Evaluation Goals and Objectives

Goal 1: Assess the impact of blended learning on student academic performance.

Objective: Compare test scores before and after program implementation.

Goal 2: Measure student engagement levels in both online and offline settings.

Objective: Use surveys and participation metrics to evaluate engagement.

Goal 3: Gather feedback on student satisfaction with the blended learning format.

Objective: Conduct focus groups and surveys to assess student perceptions.

IV. Evaluation Design

Methodology: Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative data.

Quantitative Data:Pre- and post-tests to measure academic performance.
Qualitative Data:Surveys to gauge student satisfaction.

V. Data Collection Procedures

Instruments:

Standardized tests for academic performance assessment.
Custom surveys for engagement and satisfaction measurement.
Focus group discussion guides.

Timeline:

Pre-evaluation phase (Month 1): Administer pre-tests and initial surveys.
Implementation phase (Months 2-10): Conduct ongoing assessments of engagement.
Post-evaluation phase (Month 11): Administer post-tests and final surveys.

VI. Reporting Procedures

Data Analysis Plan:

Use statistical analysis for quantitative data (e.g., t-tests for pre/post comparison).
Thematic analysis for qualitative data from focus groups.

Reporting Format:

Comprehensive evaluation report including findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

VII. Stakeholder Involvement

Identify key stakeholders (teachers, administrators, students) and involve them throughout the evaluation process for feedback and insights.

Strengths of the Proposed Evaluation

Comprehensive Approach: By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the evaluation captures a holistic view of the program's impact.
Stakeholder Engagement: Involving stakeholders ensures that the evaluation is relevant and addresses their concerns and needs.
Clear Objectives: Well-defined goals and objectives provide a focused framework for assessing the program's effectiveness.

Weaknesses of the Proposed Evaluation

Resource Intensive: The mixed-methods approach may require significant time, personnel, and financial resources to implement effectively.
Potential Biases: Self-reported data from surveys may be subject to biases, affecting the reliability of engagement and satisfaction measurements.
Limited Generalizability: Findings from this specific high school may not be applicable to other educational contexts or settings without further research.

Conclusion

This proposed evaluation aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of a blended learning program, highlighting its strengths while acknowledging potential challenges. By systematically assessing its impact on student outcomes, educators can make informed decisions about future instructional strategies.