An example of an alternative form of assessment is portfolio assessment. This method involves students collecting their work over time, creating a compilation that demonstrates their learning process, skills, and achievements across a subject or set of subjects. Portfolios can include written essays, project reports, multimedia presentations, artwork, or other forms of student output that show progress and mastery over time. Unlike traditional tests that assess students' performance at one point, portfolios offer a broader and more in-depth picture of a student's capabilities.

Portfolio assessment shifts the focus from memorization and test-taking skills to reflection, self-assessment, and creative output. This method assumes that learning is a process that unfolds over time and can be captured in a variety of formats, not just through multiple-choice questions or standardized tests. The flexibility of portfolio assessment allows students to showcase strengths that might not emerge in traditional assessments, such as creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking. Furthermore, it encourages self-directed learning, as students often have to select pieces to include and reflect on their own progress.

However, there are challenges associated with portfolio assessment. One potential issue is subjectivity in grading, as the evaluation of portfolios can be less standardized than traditional tests. This subjectivity can lead to inconsistent grading across different evaluators unless clear rubrics and guidelines are established. Additionally, the time-intensive nature of compiling and reviewing portfolios can be burdensome for both students and educators. Despite these challenges, portfolio assessment remains a valuable tool for fostering deeper engagement with learning and offering a more holistic view of student development.