Standardized tests are at their best when used as part of a comprehensive assessment toolkit rather than the sole determinant of a student's ability or potential. They can provide a standardized measure for comparing students' knowledge across regions or demographics, offering a benchmark for educational standards.

However, at their worst, standardized tests might restrict teaching methods, narrowing the curriculum to fit the test content. This limitation can overlook other important skills and attributes crucial for success but not measured by the test. Also, these tests might introduce biases or cultural differences, disadvantaging certain groups and perpetuating inequalities.

The implementation of a standardized test involves administering the same set of questions to all test-takers under controlled conditions. This ensures consistency in evaluation and allows for comparisons across a broad range of students. The strengths lie in their objectivity and ability to provide quantifiable data for educational analysis. Yet, weaknesses include the inability to measure certain essential skills, potential cultural biases, and the stress they can induce on students and educators due to high stakes associated with the results.

In essence, while standardized tests offer standardized measurement, they should be complemented with other assessment methods to provide a more holistic view of a student's abilities and potential.