FA16 Immunization Module’s Updates
Subunit, conjugate, and synthetic vaccines
Subunit, conjugate, and synthetic vaccines are types of vaccines that share similar concepts. Rather than use an entire microbe, either live or inactivated, these vaccines instead use a particle that the immune system can recognize to mount a defense against the particle's associated infection[1]. This approach has a number of advantages, such as a lower risk of adverse reaction to the vaccine and promoting an immune response against an ideal epitope.
Subunit Vaccine: Subunit vaccines use a purified antigen to elicit an immune response[2]. The whole antigen may be used in this case, or it could be the epitope alone. Subunit vaccines are particularly useful for infections that have a toxin component (i.e. diphtheria and tetanus). In these cases, a toxoid, or inactivated toxin, can be used to mediate protection[1].
Conjugate vaccine: Conjugate vaccines are made by linking polysaccharides to antigens[1]. This provides something that T cells can recognize, which is important for B cell maturation[3]. The result of this is a stronger response from B cells.
Synthetic vaccine: Synthetic vaccines use an artificially synthesized peptide. This could potentially have a variety of uses and advantages. In the case of a quickly mutating virus like HIV, a vaccine that targets a highly conserved portion of viral protein would have clear advantages, and this is an approach currently being used to create such a vaccine[4].
@Andrew Murphy Do these vaccines utilize different parts of a pathogen to create a response, or will they use a single antigenic component. So can they use 5 or 6 antigenic components in a single vaccine or do they just use 1. I would think that if you use a couple different antigenic components the immune response would be more robust.
Hi Andrew,
I think that it's very interesting that parts of a whole microbe can be used to confer immunity and I think that the possible implications of this technology are also very promising. I know that the issue with vaccination compliance for many people is the fear of adverse reaction, and with vaccinations that lower the chances of that may increase compliance. I wonder if you discovered what the efficacy of these vaccinations are compared to their traditional counterparts? Do these vaccinations work about the same, better or not quite as well as presenting the whole microbe to the immune system?