New Learning’s Updates
On Cyber-Social Learning: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Artificial Intelligence is an idea that not only promises too much; it elides the irreducible differences between human intelligence and the electronic manipulation of binary notation. This chapter does three things. 1) In broad historical and philosophical brushstrokes, it critiques the idea of artificial intelligence. The development of computers is discussed from a long, historical perspective, as well as recent developments in computing capacity, focusing particularly on generative AI. 2) It examines human-computer interaction as a relationship of two fundamentally different kinds of “intelligence”—so different, in fact, that the words “human” and “artificial” barely warrant the right to describe the same thing. Computers can indeed automate a good deal of cognitive and communicative work as they radically extend human natural capacities yet in quite unnatural ways. 3) The chapter proposes an alternative orientation to understanding and using AI that we call “cyber-social learning.” This stands in contrast to the idea that artificial intelligence, further reduced to an acronym and a hashtag, #AI, is unabashedly a replicant of human intelligence. Thus, we ask the question, what does this mean for the social project of education and the role of computers in learning? A concluding section proposes a program of action in a “manifesto for cyber-social learning.”
Full text here:
- Forthcoming chapter: Cope, Bill and Mary Kalantzis, "On Cyber-Social Learning: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” in Trust and Inclusion in AI-Mediated Education: Where Human Learning Meets Learning Machines, edited by Theodora Kourkoulou, Anastasia O. Tzirides, Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, Cham CH: Springer, 2024.
It's interesting to know how the mainstream of AI was developed with a focus on quick financial gain. If I understand correctly, it was only with Turing that the term intelligence was applied to a machine, and it was only with McCarthy that the term artificial was applied to intelligence. McCarthy sought financial advantages, and Robert Mercer further aligned the field with capitalist interests. After their contributions, the field became heavily influenced by digital capitalism. Unfortunately, the media power associated with these interests has played a significant role in promoting AI ideology while overshadowing previous research and alternative approaches, such as cybernetics.
Could McCarthy's proposal also be interpreted as a rebranding during the transition from wartime efforts to the civilian side of the post-war industry?
Terrific theorizing on cyber-social learning!