Dynamic Approaches


You must sign in to view content.

Sign In

Sign In

Sign Up

Moderator
Meinrad Haule Lembuka, Assistant Lecturer, Sociology and Social Work, The Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

The Need to Apply a Contemporary Version of Indigenous Thinking to Realizing Sustainability View Digital Media

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Stephen Sachs  

To realize sustainability, it is necessary to incorporate a contemporary version of Indigenous thinking about problems and solutions. Western science has made numerous advances by reducing its scope to narrow concerns, assuming general approaches apply everywhere. Failure to analyze holistically and long term has caused a complex environmental crisis, along with social, economic, and political imbalance. That situation has been improving but needs to advance further. It is necessary to undertake holistic systems thinking, noting how everything is interconnected with varying degrees of independence in an interlinking whole of numerous, often overlapping, systems and subsystems. While everything is related, each place is different. Valid general approaches often require significant adaptation to be applied in specific places. Policies need to be long term, with short and medium term considerations. Since knowledge is always limited, risks must be carefully weighed before acting, and actions regularly reviewed and adjusted for changing circumstances and new learnings. This is most obvious concerning the physical environment, but is equally so in social, economic and political matters. Indeed, the environmental and socio-political-economic need to be seen as a whole. Since knowledge is limited, good policy can only be made with the participatory input of all concerned, with political and economic power relatively equal to ensure balanced outcomes. If policy of all kinds is made from this perspective, so far as possible, with ongoing learning and redirecting thought and efforts as events and policies unfold, reasonable sustainability is possible in all spheres.

The Transversalization of Sustainable Development at the Institución Universitaria Colombo Americana – UNICA through the “ÚNICA al Servicio de los ODS” (“UNICA at the Service of the SDGs”) Program: Learnings, Priorities and Solutions

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Constanza Amezquita Quintana  

This paper systematizes the experience of the transversalization of the sustainable development approach at the Institución Universitaria Colombo Americana – ÚNICA, a Higher Education Institution in Bogotá-Colombia which aims to the training of bilingual teachers whose higher purpose is the transformation of society through education. This transversalization takes place by means of the “ÚNICA al servicio de los ODS” (“UNICA at the service of the SDGs”) program, which was created in 2022 and has five components which correspond to the strategic areas of the institution, namely: (1) training and teaching, (2) institutional policies, (3) research, (4) extension and social impact, and (5) campus management and organization. To carry out this systematization, the UNESCO methodology for the systematization of innovative educational experiences was addressed, which includes three major phases: (1) reconstruction of the experience process, (2) analysis and interpretation, and (3) dissemination. The emphases and priorities given in the different components are highlighted, mainly in the components of institutional policies, training and teaching and research. The above through the adoption of sustainability policy, the UNESCO Sustainability Education Approach and the promotion of teaching initiatives in the subjects, as well as by the colaborative work of ÚNICA with two Mexican universities in the research seedbed in education for sustainability, which promotes sustainability through interdisciplinarity and international cooperation.

Featured Public Trust in Crop and Livestock Farmers: Social Sustainability of Farms

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Rita Saleh  

A lack of public trust in farmers can impede having a food production system that is functional and socially acceptable. It can also lead to stricter and unfounded regulations on farming practices that limit farmers and even influence the viability and social sustainability of farms. Therefore, we examine the public image of farmers and the agriculture sector through a survey of 481 participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We assess consumers’ trust in crop and livestock production farmers, as well as their perceived knowledge and affect toward farmers. Other individual and behavioral factors are identified to build trust in farmers. The results reveal that the public has a simplistic and traditional view of agriculture and farmers, as they do not spontaneously associate them with new farming practices or technologies. However, crop farmers are more trusted than livestock production farmers, with concerns related to the transparency of farmers, care for the environment, and animal welfare. Trust in crop and livestock farmers is influenced by affect toward farmers, perceived knowledge and political orientations, whereas behavioral factors (i.e., meat consumption) only influence trust in livestock production farmers. Moreover, there is a positive correlation between purchasing at farms and trust in farmers, showing that building trust in farmers may need to be more personal and relational than systemic. Overall, our results provide suggestions on how to build and maintain public trust in both crop and livestock farmers through farmers’ initiatives and agricultural policies.

Building a Sustainability Action Plan in Higher Education

Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Candace Miller  

Fanshawe College's commitment to sustainability is reflected in its 2020-2025 strategic plan, which aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The College has developed a comprehensive 2023-2030 Sustainability Action Plan that emphasizes a cross-institutional approach to enhance environmental and social sustainability. This plan was informed by extensive research, including environmental scans of Canadian institutions and participation in the AASHE conference, alongside an evaluation of SDG goals within the UN framework. The initial assessment of Fanshawe's activities, using the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment, and Rating System (STARS), highlighted the College's strengths and identified areas for growth, particularly in advancing SDGs 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 16. Following this evaluation, Fanshawe focused on seven priority SDGs, adding goals 13 and 17, and established 21 specific targets critical to its strategic direction. The College aims to solidify its leadership in sustainability by fostering a culture of sustainability across all institutional domains. The Action Plan is anchored in four interdependent cornerstones: leadership and culture, operations, learning, research and innovation, and community engagement. These cornerstones provide a cohesive framework for action, integrating the College’s strategic plan with STARS evaluation outcomes. Fanshawe's journey towards sustainability is essential to fostering an integrated sustainability culture within the academic community and broader society.

Digital Media

Discussion board not yet opened and is only available to registered participants.