Abstract
In many nations, ageing in place is considered a standard practice for people to grow older in familiar environments without formal aid. The framework boasts many advantages both for people wishing to age in place, and for the state. However, the term can be vague and often embody different definitions depending on the context of use. Also, the extent of ‘place’ can look very different depending on an individual’s physical conditions and living arrangements. This study uses GIS mapping to effectively demonstrate and communicate the implications of ageing in place for differently-mobile individuals living in different geographical settings. Employing a mix of quantitative and qualitative GIS mapping and analysis, this paper uses synthesized profiles of people to analyze their potential mobility and activity range. The focus of this paper is on the neighborhood and surrounding environment rather than within the dwelling. The locations selected for analysis differ in rurality and public transit access, allowing for variations in the demonstration and visual comparison between locations. The results of this study suggest a notable contrast in the potential activity range depending on the neighborhood composition and surrounding geographical features. Parallel with such findings, this study suggests a methodological tool that could assist the evaluation of ageing in place adequacy for older people with mobility limitations. This can be useful for policy makers and potential aspirants of ageing in place in improving comprehension of the implications and plausible future risks entailing ageing in place in certain locations.
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
Economic and Demographic Perspectives on Aging
KEYWORDS
Ageing in place, Neighborhood, GIS, Evaluation tool
