Abstract
This paper explores the factors influencing the responses of women’s organizations to violence against women and girls in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The study investigates the hypothesis that women’s organizations operating in regions or countries with diplomatic relations that strongly favor one side of the conflict may be more likely to align their positions with their host country’s foreign policy. Drawing from a literature review that emphasizes the geopolitical influences on women’s organizations, the challenges faced by women’s organizations in conflict zones, and the relationship between media coverage and advocacy priorities, this research aims to provide insights into the complexities surrounding the prioritization of violence against women and girls in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The study employs a content analysis approach, examining public statements, reports, and advocacy materials produced by women’s organizations operating within and outside the region. By analyzing the content of these materials, this research seeks to reveal patterns and trends in how these organizations address violence against women and girls and how organizations positions may align or diverge with host country foreign policies. The findings of this study have implications for the work of women’s organizations operating in conflict zones and offer insights into the broader context of international advocacy efforts for women’s rights.
Presenters
Stephen SussmanProfessor of Public Administration, Andreas School of Business and Public Administration, Barry University, Florida, United States James Talerico
Assistant Professor, PACE, Barry University, Florida, United States Carole Huberman
Barry University
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
Civic, Political, and Community Studies
KEYWORDS
Women, Violence, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Women in Conflict Zones
